FCC Seeks Additional Comments on Closed Captioning Issues

Comments Due November 24th
Reply Comments Due December 9th

http://www.lermansenter.com/i/leventhal-logo-new.jpg

The FCC recently released a Public Notice seeking additional comments on various closed captioning issues that were initially raised in rulemaking proceedings in 2005 and 2008.  The FCC seeks to “refresh the record” in these proceedings in light of the completion of the DTV transition, advances in captioning technology, the expanded availability of captioning services nationwide and the fact that many of the FCC’s captioning benchmarks have been achieved.  Specifically, the FCC seeks comments and information on the following subjects:

Non-Technical Quality Standards

The FCC seeks additional comments on whether it should establish quality standards for non-technical aspects of closed captioning, such as accuracy of transcription, spelling, grammar, punctuation and caption placement.  It also asks what the implementation of such standards would cost to program producers and distributors, including television stations, whether there are a sufficient number of competent caption providers available to meet such a captioning standard mandate, and whether different captioning standards should apply to live and pre-recorded programming.

Monitoring and Enforcement

The FCC also seeks additional comments on whether there is a need for mechanisms and procedures in addition to the “pass through rule” (which requires video programming distributors to deliver captioned programming with the captioning data intact), to prevent technical problems from occurring and to expeditiously remedy any problems that arise.  The FCC currently requires video programming distributors to monitor and maintain their equipment and signal transmissions to ensure that captioning information actually reaches consumers, but has not established any mandated monitoring or maintenance steps that must be followed.  The FCC also inquires whether it should establish specific per-violation forfeiture amounts for captioning violations, and whether video programming distributors, such as television stations, should be required to file closed captioning reports with the FCC.

Electronic News Gathering Technique

Closed captions created through the electronic news gathering technique (“ENT”) only include text transmitted from the scripting computers to the teleprompters.  Unscripted material, such as breaking news, live reports from the field, and some weather and sports reports that do not appear on the teleprompter are not typically captioned by this method.  Currently, major national broadcast networks (i.e., ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC), affiliates of these networks in the top 25 DMAs, and national non-broadcast networks serving at least 50% of all homes subscribing to multi-channel video programming services are not permitted to count ENT-captioned programming towards compliance with the closed captioning rules.  The FCC now asks whether the use of ENT should be prohibited in markets beyond the top 25 DMAs.

Multicasting

Finally, the FCC seeks additional information on how the closed captioning exemption for channels producing revenues of less than $3 million should apply to digital multicast channels.  In 2008, the FCC sought comments on whether each programming stream on a multicast channel should be treated as a separate channel for purposes of determining whether the channel had produced more than $3 million in revenue during the prior year.  The FCC now asks what the potential ramifications would be if it concluded that each multicast stream were deemed to be a separate channel.

Comments in this proceeding are due by November 24th, with reply comments due December 9th.  If you are interested in filing comments in this proceeding, or have any questions concerning the FCC’s closed captioning rules, please contact your primary attorney in this office.

November 4, 2010

 

Follow Lerman Senter on Twitter

 

This memorandum is intended only as a general discussion of these issues and should not be regarded as legal advice.

We would be pleased to provide additional details or advice about specific situations if desired.

Copyright © 2010, Lerman Senter PLLC

2000 K Street NW, Suite 600 | Washington, DC 20006-1809
tel. 202.429.8970 | fax 202.293.7783 | www.lermansenter.com

To Unsubscribe: Unsubscribe  |   To Update Client Info: Update Client Info